Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Daniel Masur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Masur analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Daniel Masur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wild 1 - 0 Masur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.8% of points on their second serve, while Masur has won 50.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 51.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Masur has won 51.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.98% and 31.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Masur has saved 64.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Masur winning 67.12% (W/L 49/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 192/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 136/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.04% of matches (W/L 10/ 17), where as Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 1 times and Masur being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Masur winning 0. The last match between Wild and Masur was at the Braunschweig Challenger, 12-07-2023, Second, Clay with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Masur have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wild winning 0 times and Masur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 0, and Masur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.75 while Masur has played against players with an average rank of 197.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Masur has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 42.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Masur has converted 44.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
71
Rank
58
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
301
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (226-172)
Career Total W/L
58% (386-281)
50% (17-17)
YTD W/L
76% (34-11)
$678,730
Career Prize Money
$151,200
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:33 | 1:15:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (25/47) | 58% (29/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (22/25) | 59% (17/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 33% (7/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (26/50) | 32% (15/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Daniel Masur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (17/17) | 76% (34/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (44/40) | 71% (75/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (400/390) | 57% (595/454) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 85% (28/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 166 | 247 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 120 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:31 | 1:42:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.26 | 178.49 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1621/2578) | 65% (2081/3206) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1133/1621) | 75% (1566/2081) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (467/957) | 51% (573/1125) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (89/208) | 44% (147/334) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (871/2388) | 39% (1311/3320) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (6/10) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 79% (11/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (23/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 76% (34/45) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 59% (13/22) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 56% (9/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 86% (37/32) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 14% (37/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 25% (8/2) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Gregoire Barrere
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Daniel Masur
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
28
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
1-6 7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Masur Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Wild are available here and Masur photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
